Finding Peace in Death Comes For The Archbishop Essay -- Archbishop

Discovering Peace in Death Comes For The Archbishop   â Willa Cather's Death Comes For The Archbishop is a novel set in the nineteenth century in New Mexico.â The story follows the undertakings of Father Vaillant and Father Latour, two refined French ministers determined to advance Catholicism in Santa Fe.â The story follows each man's encounters in these grungy environmental factors making them experience emotional changes as they experience the westbound development of the frontier.â Through the battles and excursions of a large group of characters, we find the hidden pressures of common interruptions that can make a separated character between oneself.   â â â â The primary case of an isolated character I might want to talk about is that of the cardinals in Rome. It appears as though the leaders of the Catholic Church enjoy common belongings to satisfy their otherworldly desires.â ...I had this wine raised from my basement particularly to warm away the chill of your twenty Canadian winters.â Surely, you don't accumulate vintages like this on the shores of the Great Lake Huron?(9).â These high cardinals appear to have become given to extravagances of life than to God and the Catholic Church.â This conduct negates the lessons of Catholicism itself, where common issue isn't of importance.â This entry builds a reasonable admonition to the peruser, clarifying that these characters appear to have gotten on board with the temporary fad of globalization, accordingly now and again overlooking their strict ties.â It is difficult to state if these cardinals have ever encountered the significance of genuine dedication to God, a state of confidence where material extravagances have no value.â Latour might be looked downward on to accomplish the difficult work of the missions yet his experie... ... house of God, diverting him from his crucial arrive at the local people.â   â â â â Although Father Latour may have scarcely any common wants, one may contend he needs what others can profit by just as satisfying himself.â Along his excursions, Latour experiences different individuals, most partners of the Catholic Church like himself.â It appears as each time Latour distinguishes a feeling of double dealing in an individual, he advances in his own crucial morality.â When one is making a decent attempt to grasp and keep the standards and limitations of religion, just as appreciate the common extravagances, a separated character is made inside oneself.â It isn't until valid and all out dedication is focused on ones religion that material things become unessential and one can be at peace.â â â  Work Cited:  Cather, Willa. Passing Comes for the Archbishop. NY: Vintage Books, 1990.

“Little boy crying” by Mervin Morris Essay

Mervin Morris composes â€Å"Little kid crying† making reference to the connection between a child and a grown-up, who for this situation is his dad. All through the sonnet various sentiments and feelings are communicated, of the kid as well as of the man. The young man transformed his â€Å"recently relaxed† face into â€Å"tight† in view of that â€Å"quick slap struck† his â€Å"guilty† father gave him. In any case, in spite of the way that the child accepting his dad as a â€Å"grim giant† on account of hitting him, this man’s aim was not to cause him to endure of torment or anything like that; it was only an undesirable yet essential little discipline, maybe for a trick or trouble making. Truth be told the dad felt â€Å"guilty† and brimming with â€Å"sorrow†. Mervin presents a purposeful anecdote of a somewhat celebrated story called: â€Å"Jack and the beanstalk†. The kid envisioned his dad as a â€Å"ogre†, who climbed a tremendous tree. â€Å"He despises him†. He envisioned himself â€Å"chopping clean the tree he’s scrambling down or plotting further pits to trap him†, as it occurs in â€Å"Jack and the beanstalk†. The connection between the â€Å"three-year-old† brimming with â€Å"frustration† kid and the grown-up is by all accounts blasting of complexities in light of the fact that the child is very impulsive and the man needs to rebuff him, so he learns not to do anything he desires without assessing the results previously. Be that as it may, he â€Å"cannot comprehend, not yet† how his â€Å"easy tears† influence his dad who is wishing to â€Å"curb† boy’s trouble. Despite the fact that a monster can rebuff you, you realize that he cherishes you and that you need to take in the â€Å"lessons† from him, since you know, extremely somewhere inside, that beast is your dad. That last sentence can outlines the lesson of the sonnet. This specific sonnet utilizes words to cause the peruser to feel the individual in question is â€Å"seeing† it, or being a piece of it: â€Å"the brisk slap struck†, this last sentence is made out of monosyllabic words that emulate the sound of the hit. Another case of this â€Å"trying the peruser to feel some portion of the poem† is the utilization of the â€Å"you†; it is a sort of discussion between the author and the peruser. Different pictures that encourage this procedure are utilized words or expressions recommending development or sound, as â€Å"chopping† and â€Å"scrambling down†. Yet, in this sonnet isn't about the child, and his sentiments, the other character has a significant job. He needs to imagine being something isn't; â€Å"behind that mask† there is a man who endures the circumstance more that the child, yet he must be viewed as a severe power, as any parent must. This sonnet reflects only reality of a customary connection between any dad and his child during the developing and developing procedure of the child; yet it doesn't end there: in the last section, which is additionally the last line, there is a nine words in length sentence underlined by being disregarded, that conveys a good in it: â€Å"you must not make a toy of the rain†. This is an allegory that could be interpreted as: â€Å"you must not cry just because† (the downpour speaks to the tears).

History 495 Jewish Humor in History topic Writer, Director, and Research Paper

History 495 Jewish Humor in History point Writer, Director, and Comedian Woody Allen - Research Paper Example This paper is fixated on Woody Allen’s works’ Jewishness viewpoint. The point is to point at Allen’s Jewish foundation on his work. Moreover the paper looks at Woody Allen’s characters’ connection to Jewishness. One of the generally known craftsmen of the twentieth century is Allen. He is an eminent Director, Script essayist, acknowledged dramatist, short story author and acelebrated clarinet player. The entirety of his works are normal for his undertakings and his style can without much of a stretch be distinguished with regards to his prior youth faith in Jewish religion and culture. A portion of his work in writing and film are trademark with realizing humor and can undoubtedly be distinguished from that of different craftsmen for the explanation that his characters feature on adoration, faith in God, eccentricism, craftsmanship importance of life and passing. This reality is profoundly established in him despite the fact that he attempts to stifle it through nonbeliever conducts. These attributes of Allen in his work have had the option to draw significant acknowledgment and consideration from characters who structure his crowd. Properties from his work, plot, impacts and usual way of do ing things working together with his silly side all portray in a manner his Jewish confidence childhood. A significant number of the investigations completed on the film and artistic work of Allen have all addressed all parts of enthusiasm aside from the short stories which are then again quickly mentioned1. The short stories anyway structure a significant piece of Allen’s work and ought not be put aside in investigate. Allen’s short stories extend from philosophical, historiography, dreamlike, journalistic among others2. Despite the fact that these short story pieces spread various subjects, they all have shared topics which revolve around life and the occasions of life, acknowledgment of death, strict conviction, love, morals, and impressions of a man. In a scene from Annie Hall, alad is to be found with his mom in

Essay Writing Topics for Class 5

Essay Writing Topics for Class 5Before you start writing your essay, you should first decide which topic is the best for your class. If your class will be studying creative writing, then you will find it a lot easier to get your topic selected as compared to when you are going to write an essay on history, political science or business management.In order to narrow down your choices, you can make use of online resources that have been designed for different topics. To begin with, you can consult the resources for a thesis and introduction topics for your class.There are even sites that offer you different topics for a single subject. For example, if you are going to study International Business, you can get a site which offers you a number of International Business writing topics for your class. The more categories you choose from, the more choice you will have and thus you can have your pick of topics.This site also helps you browse through all of the same articles as those you woul d find in an article directory and for that you need to register for a membership. However, this is not a bad idea since you will have access to other useful information as well. You can click through and read through the other person's essays on various topics.Apart from these sites, you can also take help from other sources. This will involve looking at some blogs on a particular company's website and then you can come up with your own ideas.For example, if you are going to study Business Management, you can start by checking out the blogs related to Business Management. You can also check out the articles published by many professors or MBA students. You can also ask for a free sample of a business writing sample.After you have picked a topic, you will have to write your essay. You may find it easier if you write a couple of essays before choosing a topic for the entire class. However, you should not write anything too personal and it is better if you leave some room for personal interpretation.

Gaining An Understanding Of Meaningful Leadership Business Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1622 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Management Essay Type Narrative essay Did you like this example? Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more organized and logical meaning Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. Leaders carry out this process by applying their leadership knowledge and skills. However, we know that we have personality that can influence our actions. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Gaining An Understanding Of Meaningful Leadership Business Essay" essay for you Create order If a leader has the desire and willpower, one can become an effective leader. Good leaders develop through a never ending process of self-study, education, training, and experience. A dedicated leader inspires his workers into higher levels of teamwork, there are certain things that an effective and dedicated leader must be, know, and, do. These do not come naturally, but are acquired through continual work and study. Effective and dedicated leaders are continually working and studying to improve their leadership skills meaning they are not resting on their success. While leadership is learned, the skills and knowledge processed by the leader can be influenced by his or hers attributes or traits, such as beliefs, values, ethics and character. Knowledge and skills contribute directly to the process of leadership, while the other attributes give the leader certain characteristics that make him or her unique meaning skills, knowledge, and attributes make the Leader more effective and dedicated. Factors of Leadership Leader You must have an honest understanding of who you are, what you know, and what you can do. Also, note that it is the followers, not the leader or someone else who determines if the leader is successful. If they do not trust or lack confidence in their leader, then they will be uninspired. To be successful you have to convince your followers, not yourself or your superiors, that you are worthy of being followed. Followers Different people require different styles of leadership. For example, a new hire requires more supervision than an experienced employee. A person who lacks motivation requires a different approach than one with a high degree of motivation. You must know your people! The fundamental starting point is having a good understanding of human nature, such as needs, emotions, and motivation. You must come to know your employees be, know, and do attributes. Communication You lead through two-way communication. Much of it is nonverbal. For instance, when you s et the example, that communicates to your people that you would not ask them to perform anything that you would not be willing to do. What and how you communicate either builds or harms the relationship between you and your employees. Situation All situations are different. What you do in one situation will not always work in another. You must use your judgment to decide the best course of action and the leadership style needed for each situation. For example, you may need to confront an employee for inappropriate behavior, but if the confrontation is too late or too early, too harsh or too weak, then the results may prove ineffective. Also note that the situation normally has a greater effect on a leaders action than his or her traits. This is because while traits may have an impressive stability over a period of time, they have little consistency across situations. Leadership Models Structural Framework In an effective leadership situation, the leader is a social architect whose leadership style is analysis and design. While in an ineffective leadership situation, the leader is a petty tyrant whose leadership style is details. Structural Leaders focus on structure, strategy, environment, implementation, experimentation, and adaptation. Human Resource Framework In an effective leadership situation, the leader is a catalyst and servant whose leadership style is support, advocating, and empowerment. while in an ineffective leadership situation, the leader is a pushover, whose leadership style is abdication and fraud. Human Resource Leaders believe in people and communicate that belief; they are visible and accessible; they empower, increase participation, support, share information, and move decision making down into the organization. Political Framework In an effective leadership situation, the leader is an advocate, whose leadership style is coalition and building. While in an ineffective leadership situation, the leader is a hustler, whose leadership style is manipulation. Political leaders clarify what they want and what they can get; they assess the distribution of power and interests; they build linkages to other stakeholders, use persuasion first, then use negotiation and coercion only if necessary. Symbolic Framework In an effective leadership situation, the leader is a prophet, whose leadership style is inspiration. While in an ineffective leadership situation, the leader is a fanatic or fool, whose leadership style is smoke and mirrors. Symbolic leaders view organizations as a stage or theater to play certain roles and give impressions; these leaders use symbols to capture attention; they try to frame experience by providing plausible interpretations of experiences; they discover and communicate a vision. The Two Most Important Keys to Effective Leadership Trust and confidence in top leadership was the single most reliable predictor of employee satisfaction in an organization. Effective communication by leadership in three critical areas was the key to winning organizational trust and confidence: Helping employees understand the companys overall business strategy. Helping employees understand how they contribute to achieving key business objectives. Sharing information with employees on both how the company is doing and how an employees own division is doing à ¢ÃƒÆ' ¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã… ¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¬ relative to strategic business objectives. Principles of Leadership Know yourself and seek self-improvement In order to know yourself, you have to understand your be, know, and do, attributes. Seeking self-improvement means continually strengthening your attributes. This can be accomplished through self-study, formal classes, reflection, and interacting with others. Be technically proficient As a leader, you must know your job and have a solid familiarity with your employees tasks. Seek responsibility and take responsibility for your actions Search for ways to guide your organization to new heights. And when things go wrong, they always do sooner or later à ¢ÃƒÆ' ¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã… ¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¬ do not blame others. Analyze the situation, take corrective action, and move on to the next challenge. Make sound and timely decisions Use good problem solving, decision making, and planning tools. Set the example Be a good role model for your employees. They must not only hear what they are expected to do, but also see. Know your people and look out for their well-being Know human nature and the importance of sincerely caring for your workers. Keep your workers informed Know how to communicate with not only them, but also seniors and other key people. Develop a sense of responsibility in your workers Help to develop good character traits that will help them carry out their professional responsibilities. Ensure that tasks are understood, supervised, and accomplished Communication is the key to this responsibility. Train as a team Although many so called leaders call their organization, department, section, etc. a team; they are not really teamsthey are just a group of people doing their jobs. Use the full capabilities of your organization By developing a team spirit, you will be able to employ your organization, department, section, etc. to its fullest capabilities. Attributes of Leadership If you are a leader who can be trusted, then those around you will grow to respect you. BE KNOW DO BE a professional. Examples: Be loyal to the organization, perform selfless service, and take personal responsibility. BE a professional who possess good character traits. Examples: Honesty, competence, candor, commitment, integrity, courage, straightforwardness, imagination. KNOW the four factors of leadership à ¢ÃƒÆ' ¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã… ¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¬ follower, leader, communication, situation. KNOW yourself. Examples: strengths and weakness of your character, knowledge, and skills. KNOW human nature. Examples: Human needs, emotions, and how people respond to stress. KNOW your job. Examples: be proficient and be able to train others in their tasks. KNOW your organization. Examples: where to go for help, its climate and culture, who the unofficial leaders are. DO provide direction. Examples: goal setting, problem solving, decision making, planning. DO implement. Examples: communicating, coordinating, supervising, evaluating. DO motivate. Examples: develop mora le and esprit de corps in the organization, train, coach, counsel. The Process of Great Leadership The road to great leadership (Kouzes HYPERLINK https://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadcon.html#fiveHYPERLINK https://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadcon.html#five Posner, 1987) that is common to successful leaders: Challenge the process First, find a process that you believe needs to be improved the most. Inspire a shared vision Next, share your vision in words that can be understood by your followers. Enable others to act Give them the tools and methods to solve the problem. Model the way When the process gets tough, get your hands dirty. A boss tells others what to do, a leader shows that it can be done. Encourage the hearts Share the glory with your followers hearts, while keeping the pains within your own. Great Business Leaders of New Zealand Air NZ chief executive Rob Fyfe Fyfe this year did what his predecessors had failed to do he did the decent thing and apologized for the airlines behavior following the Erebus tragedy. That got the most headlines, but relatively quietly this year the airline has survived the most severe aviation slump in history in profit and in good shape for 2010, with new planes on order and a makeover coming. Ryman Healthcare chief executive Simon Challies Simon Challies has been described by institutional investors as one of the years outstanding performers. He runs the national retirement village chain from Christchurch. Ryman, with a $1 billion market capitalization, last month posted a realized profit of $29 million for the half-year to September 30, up 12 per cent

The Classification Of Native Americans - 1457 Words

The classification of Native Americans by the United States government has long produced tension. Native Americans within the United States are classified using standards that differ from those used to classify other racial or ethnic minorities, specifically African Americans. While, historically, the classification of African-Americans as relied upon the â€Å"one-drop† rule, the classification of Native Americans over the past hundred years has relied upon varying, complicated, and ultimately arbitrary blood rules. However, the reliance upon blood laws does not illustrate the effects of self-identification or identification by others. Across the United States, there are various persons who would self-identify as Native American but are not†¦show more content†¦The new legal system enforced a new ruling system that allowed for national authority over certain aspects of life, especially that of schools, town councils, taxes, and language. The system was built upon the rule of self-identification; that is the process of defining who was who was done via the individual s self-declaration through the census. However, the system still contained flaws and frauds which could not go unaddressed; again the self-profession principle came to be the defining factor in many of these disputed cases. Self-profession within the case of Native Americans in the United States has been deemed insufficient evidence of the validity of one s identity. While, self-profession is used for certain types of identification, there is an extraordinary reliance upon historical censuses and what tribes are recognized, legitimated, by the BIA. Few tribes are still recognized, only 566 are still currently recognized by the BIA, yet many of those who are not recognized by the BIA still identify as Native American. The criteria used to recognize tribes, as well the tribes themselves use differing criteria to determine status within a tribe itself. A combination of various quotas o f blood complexifies a system already complicated enough, each tribe and the government as a whole uses certain blood standards to determine the legitimacy of membership to a specific tribe. Similar to the Austrian cases’ problems of dealing with ideas of blood, where in blood

Power in the USA Today

Question: Write an essay on power in the USA today? Answer: The demise of the cold war in the 1990s marked the rise of the United States of America (Davis 2015). The rise to supremacy was partly supported by the whole world's acceptance of America as a leader of the nations. Its position in global politics and geopolitics has also contributed to the elevation. America plays a central role in global politics and has a strong hold on the geopolitics of the international system (Carton 2014). Its centralized position as a superpower implies its important position in the international arena. It will not be wrong to call it the grandmaster of international affairs. America believes that modern day world is too complex for direct democracy, and that is why good decisions are to be made by elected representatives instead. In this essay, we discuss the division of power in America and its position in the global arena in the modern age and time. The global system is not ideal; instead, it is unstable as well as anarchic. The essay has a critical edge and discusses the standpoint of the USA in today's day and time. At times, the country seems to be in a state of chaos with a hyper-partisanized government that can barely control the situation. Then America and its government rise to the occasion and save the day to retain its position as the financial, corporate, geopolitical and political leader of the nations (Rachman 2012). This essay discusses the role of America in maintaining the global standards in the world. The continuous chatter about the inevitable ebb of the United States power has become customary. Everybody knows that the US is going to fall and every week more bad news about the United States power paradigm seems to confirm this notion. The country has turned into an ungovernable mess with a disorganized hyperactive Congress, government shutdowns, and slow economic recovery after the sump season and NSA spy scandal (Smith 2012). This is not organized chaos. America is ranked 24th in the economy while Americans are ranked 11th in Happiness (Kawa 2013). The facts are not very encouraging. A study conducted on eighth graders revealed that a small percentage of American students have excellent hold of advanced mathematics and in comparison to American students, students from South Korea and Singapore had far higher ratings. However, the picture was not the same a decade or two ago. The shift of power from bipolar to unipolar power system induced the rise of America and enhanced the super power image of the nation (Xuetong 2013). Incidentally, the power shift boosted capitalism and globalization. This gave rise to an imaginary notion of world unity. America's continued thirst for power, domination, and organization gave rise to the umbrella effect wherein every country other than America is under the assumed safety limits of America. Even so, the picture has barely changed after decades. The United States is still the world leader and will likely remain so for the next few decades. The greatest soft power is in its hands. Millions of immigrants with different skills, tools and techniques come to the country every year. There is the Silicon Valley, biggest movie sector in Hollywood, some of the best universities and colleges for higher education, 17 out of 20 top universities in the world are from America, and the country has a first world trade profile (Forbes.com 2016). However, the power structure of the country has not changed a lot in the modern times. C. Wright Mills' book the Power Elite rightly defines America's power structure as an elitist fundamentalist. The book was published in 1956; those were simpler times, but the structure remains the same. According to the book and according to the musings of Karl Marx, relatively small groups of people who own the big factories and control the natural resources govern capitalist and industrial societies like America. The government officials are essentially working under their command. They have no control over the workings of the nation, as they do not control the money. As represented by the Mills model, the power structure could be illustrated as a pyramid at the top of which are the rich corporate leaders followed by the influential high-end government and military officials. Following the triumvirate are the local opinion holding leaders, people from the legislative branch of the government, special interest groups and their leaders. The bottom of the pyramid and the society is governed by clueless unorganized masses (Whitfield 2014). This was the power structure in the yesteryears and this s the truth of today. So, in spite of a weak capitalist infrastructure why is America's Supremacy still unchallenged? Well, it is not unchallenged, and China can prove that. But there are some methods used in establishing the supremacy and demolishing the structure of the methods is not easy. Firstly, in the 1990s, USA established a degree of economic, political and military supremacy that is a rare sight in the modern power system (Mingst and Arregun-Toft 2013). The supremacy was built on longtime undisputed economic stability and continued growth. Abetting the situation was an advantageous geographical location and collapse of Americas longtime competitor. The rest of the world chose to go along to get along with the rising superpower. Not only that, the US military was constructed to be effectively unbeatable in any conflict that put the US in danger. The government built the military based on effective well-financed military training and force protection (Tang and Long 2012). However, that did not give the US military the power to achieve its political goals forcefully, but it sure did provide them with the power to put other nations military in check. However, the idea then was that this amount of power would eventually fade as it was the byproduct of World War II. The neoconservatives did not believe that America's military supremacy needed to fade anytime soon. Several steps were taken to maintain the nation's superior state. In spite of the plan, an execution was harder than ever. The plan did not consider the potential of India and China to become more ingrained in the political, economic and geopolitical structure of the world. Both the countries were enjoying continuous long-term economic growth and overcoming the effects of the hardship they had to bear with during the cold war (Ong 2013). Both the economies were becoming irreplaceable parts of the global system. Either USA had to convince the two countries to play nice or maintain a military supremacy over both the countries. It was difficult; more so because America had to ensure against the revival of the military and economic power or Eurasia. It all worked out pretty well for the United States, though. Germany and Japan have remained relatively harmless and docile for the following decades; India is more interested in an alignment with the USA than a conflict and Russia is struggling to control its borderlines. The main threat now is China with a sustained economic growth, remarkable military line, advanced technological forefront and advantageous geopolitical position. Nevertheless, China has only started to probe the military and political weaknesses of the United States of America. The Asian country is more focused on its own betterment and less focused on acquiring a supreme status (Nathan and Scobell 2012). The gap is diminishing today. Although the USA still has economic, political and geopolitical upper hand, the other countries are closing in. The 1990s were weird so the supreme power thrust that America felt at the time were ephemeral and the shrinking gap today is a sign of normalcy. However, the question is neither about unipolarity nor primacy (Pape 2014). The American power structure has not changed since the 90s but has persisted through all these decades. Actually, there is no question at all. America cannot ever feel as invulnerable as in the 1990s. That was a different time altogether. The United State's position is once again in turbulence. Although the nation is feeling incomparably powerful and secure, the picture can change at any time. Even though the nation is enjoying unchallenged military supremacy, sheer arrogance is blocking its rational view. Not that some comeuppance is required in this case because geopolitics is nothing like a Shakespearean drama or a cheap morality play but, realization is something which can help the nation grow better, and its structure becomes stronger than ever. All authoritative candidates as of yet have made some serious mistakes in upholding the country first. Although they are not responsible for the country's decline, they cannot wash their hands off the problems. The design to improve military supremacy, for instance, is still workable, but it needs serious changes (Drezner 2013). But what is the position of the United States of America today? In spite of all the turbulence, in spite of all the power shifts, in spite of the negative effects of globalization brought in with the rise of America, the nation is still considered a chief Superpower, evidently THE superpower. It is the worlds leader for FDI having a value of 180 billion dollars, twice as much as its nearest competitor. The country spends 560 billion dollars a year providing for and improving its military. It has the most powerful military in the world. Its GDP is twice as much as China's (Cooley and Snyder 2015). It is the world's first new nation, and it has the longest functioning democracy in the world of semi-democratic and non-democratic countries. In spite of recession, its stock market in on an all-time high as we speak which reflects leadership in global economy. Who can ever challenge Americas role as the global leader? The Europeans? Or maybe the Russians or the Japanese? The truth about the situation is that EU has 12% unemployment rate, which is on an extended high point in Greece and Spain-a whopping 26%. Then there is no economic growth and diminishing population. The Japanese are also suffering from a declining and rapidly aging population. There is almost no immigration in the country. Economic growth is slow, and the Nikkei Index is many points below the level of 1988. Then there is debt. About Russia, it is still trying to control its own border. Sure, it is coming to limelight sometimes, but that does not bring it into the superpower arena. It has a trade profile of a third world country, a small GNP that is less than 15% of the United States and it has no soft power or technical advantage or Hollywood or high end universities (KovaÄ  2016). However, there is China and India, right? That is far from truth because although both the countries have made serious progress in the past few decades, they also have serious problems. China has almost 650 million of its population living in the impoverished countryside, a GDP/capita of $6,100 and 87th place in the world based on the GDP/capita rates. This rate is a mere 12% of America's GDP/capita rate. There is corruption in the country, single-party communist rule, mismanaged social structure and lack of mass creativity (Kubiszewski et al. 2013). India, on the other hand, is burdened with its huge impoverished population. Almost 70% of the population lives in the poor countryside with minimal facilities. Electricity, sanitation or even water is an out of reach commodity for 160 million people in the country. The rate of illiteracy is high in the country; almost 35% of all women in the country are illiterate. The infrastructure is weak, with a GDP/capita of a low $1,500 India is a t the 138th place in the world economy. Moreover, there is a lot of corruption, rapid population growth, and a failing administrative structure (MEDIANU et al. 2015.). Can the two countries challenge America? The facts say not in the next few decades. Therefore, there is no one to stand in the way of Americas supremacy; and even with an imperfect infrastructure and power structure, Americas lead will prevail in the near future. But the critics argue over this unipolarity. Is it effective? Yes. But does it have an allover positive impact? Not likely. Critics argue about the notion of unipolarity in that it creates internal divisions in the international arena, which in turn creates a habit of shoving and forcing ideas and theories on suspecting as well as unsuspecting masses (Bilgel 2014). The single most powerful nation in the world is capable of doing this very unethical thing. Historical facts about socio-economic politics and inequalities in the international system support this notion. Earlier holders of world supremacy have behaved the same way. The super powers of the yesteryear dominated using imperialism, which gave rise to colonialism. The result was unrelenting socio-economic inequality. The ripple effect of the same is still visible. Although Americas lead is more ideological than imperial, the attempts to force its military prowess on the world for imperialistic motives and needs are quite unnerving, and the situation threatens to worsen at any given time. There is domination, and then there is coercion, which points at instability in the international arena. The countries at the forefront are afraid to lose their hold over the world. This also highlights that world politics is all about domination. The power America holds over the world is something to be aware of and afraid of because anytime a threat is felt from any other nation, the dominating nation will act up to subdue the threat and in the act many other countries will suffer. With all the money in the world in its hand, the US is building a strong, menacing and domineering army, strong hold in the international arena, stiff position in the geo-political base and a stable international infrastructure so that any other country cannot challenge its power in the international field of politics, culture, geo-politics and economy (Friedberg 2013). The US has its own problems, and there are some mistakes on its daily diary. Capitalist structure points at weak interactive base with the commoners. There are a lot of unhappy commoners in the USA, and that is why the government is subjected to a lot of scrutiny all the time. A single mistake can topple the government, and that is why the government policies are strengthening the country every day. The focus is on maintaining America's stronghold on world supremacy. The mistakes of the nation have not decreased in number, but the country is becoming strong enough to function even with the mistakes and the problems. The fact, however, is that the world has become more peaceful with US intervention, or so it seems. That is why ending the supremacy is not in the "to do" list of many countries struggling to maintain overall peace and order. Sympathizers and idealists contest with non-believers saying that the rise to supremacy has given the US the power to re-assert its position in the global map as a powerful democracy. But liberal students and believers argue that although the US has served as an international umbrella for the developed, developing and underdeveloped nations of the world, it has also misused its power to grow in size, in volume, economically and politically. The truth remains undiscovered. But the only truth that shines through this essay is that the United States of America is an all powerful nation full of possibilities, and the Supremacy the nation is enjoying is here to stay. So, we can conclude on a note that reveals America's present, past and future position in the power structure of the world. References Bilgel, Y., 2014.Regional power politics after the Cold War(Doctoral dissertation, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO). Carton, J., 2014. A Review of Confronting America: The Cold War Between the United States and the Communists in France and Italy, by Alessandro Brogi.American Communist History,13(2-3), pp.209-211. Cooley, A. and Snyder, J., 2015. Rank Has Its Privileges.Foreign Affairs,94(6), p.15. Davis, L.E., 2015.The Cold War Begins: Soviet-American Conflict Over East Europe. Princeton University Press. Drezner, D.W., 2013. Military Primacy Doesn't Pay (Nearly As Much As You Think).International Security,38(1), pp.52-79. Forbes.com. (2016).Forbes Welcome. [online] Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/11/24/why-the-u-s-remains-the-worlds-unchallenged-superpower/#79e3ca061fd8 [Accessed 14 Mar. 2016]. Friedberg, A.L., 2013. A contest for supremacy.EDUCATION ABOUT ASIA,18(3). Kawa, L., 2013. Americas Infrastructure Ranks... 25th In The World.Business Insider,16. KovaÄ , I., 2016. Book Review: The End of American World Order.Political Studies Review,14(1), pp.78-79. Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., Lawn, P., Talberth, J., Jackson, T. and Aylmer, C., 2013. Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress.Ecological Economics,93, pp.57-68. MEDIANU, D., WANG, J. and WHALLEY, J., 2015. The Contribution of China, India, and Brazil to Narrowing NorthSouth Differences in GDP/capita, World Trade Shares, and Market Capitalization We are grateful to the Ontario Research Fund and to a research group at the University of Western Ontario for comments. InWORLD SCIENTIFIC REFERENCE ON ASIA AND THE WORLD ECONOMY(pp. 129-154). Mingst, K.A. and Arregun-Toft, I.M., 2013.Essentials of International Relations: Sixth International Student Edition. WW Norton Company. Nathan, A.J. and Scobell, A., 2012. How China Sees America.Foreign Affairs,91(5), pp.32-47. Ong, R., 2013.China's security interests in the post-cold war era. Routledge. Pape, R., 2014. Soft balancing against the United States.The Realism Reader,30(1), p.406. Rachman, G., 2012. Think again: American decline.The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence,47. Smith, T., 2012.A pact with the devil: Washington's bid for world supremacy and the betrayal of the American promise. Routledge. Tang, S. and Long, S.J., 2012. Americas military interventionism: A social evolutionary interpretation.European Journal of International Relations,18(3), pp.509-538. Whitfield, S.J., 2014. Prophesying war: how convincing is The Power Elite?.Society,51(5), pp.539-546.' Xuetong, Y., 2013. The Shift of the World Centre and its Impact on the Change of the International System.East Asia,30(3), pp.217-235.